Search Results for "Trespass"

348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court declined to quash FIR in Land Fraud Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 though Civil Nature of Dispute and Complaint by Power of Attorney Holder is sustained

The petitioner, accused No. 8 in a land fraud case, sought quashing of FIR registered under various sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and House Trespass in Land Dispute Case. Appellants convicted under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC for causing grievous injuries with axe and sticks, and under Section 448 read with Section 34 IPC for house trespass.

The judgment pertains to two appeals arising from a common judgment dated 12-03-2003 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Criminal Trespass on Gayran Land — Cultivation of Grazing Land Without Authorization Not Trespass if Done Under Claim of Right. Regularization of Gayran Land for Non-Grazing Purposes Requires Compliance with Statutory Procedure Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The judgment arises from a criminal application filed by eight applicants seeking quashing of FIR No. 57/2015 registered with Dahihanda Police Station...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Over Access and Possession of Suit Plot. Court finds no prima facie case for exclusive possession or title in favour of plaintiff society of flat purchasers.

The plaintiffs, a proposed co-operative society of flat purchasers in Girnar Tower, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, incl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...