High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Former Temporary Staff Seeking Regularisation and Absorption — Petitioners Implead Registrar General, Labour Court, and District Judiciary as Respondents
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Treasury Officer"
260 result(s) found
Found 260 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.
13 Mar 2025The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...
- 667
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Comunidade's Challenge to RTI Orders — Holds Comunidades Not Public Authorities Under RTI Act. Administrative tutelage under Code of Comunidades does not make Comunidades 'public authorities' under Section 2(h) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, and no officer can be deemed a Public Information Officer.
26 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court at Goa disposed of a batch of writ petitions challenging orders under the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) that directed...
- 487
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Clerk for Bribery in Pension Case, Acquits Head Clerk Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Accused No.2 convicted under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting Rs.2000 bribe for processing pension proposal.
19 Jul 2024The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption), Pune, in Special Case No.53 of 2015. The State of...
- 610
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Auction Purchasers' Petition in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Overriding Effect of Section 26E Over MVAT Act. Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction Held Free from Prior Sales Tax Attachment Under Section 38C of MVAT Act.
12 Jul 2023The petitioners, Shailesh K. Bothra and Mukesh C. Karwa, were auction purchasers of a property sold by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd. (pe...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions to Quash FIR in Criminal Conspiracy Case — Petitioners Failed to Show FIR Lacked Prima Facie Case or Was Abuse of Process. The court held that the FIR could not be quashed as the allegations required investigation and the petitioners did not demonstrate that the FIR was frivolous or vexatious under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
23 Sep 2016The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications Under Section 24 of 2013 Act — Possession Taken and Compensation Paid Under 1894 Act Precludes Lapse. Acquisition of land for a cooperative housing society upheld as possession was taken and compensation paid before the 2013 Act came into force.
24 Jun 2015The petitioners, owners of land measuring 2 acres in Sy.No.7 and 1 acre in Sy.No.9 of Gubbalala village, Bangalore South Taluk, challenged the acquisi...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Cashier in Misappropriation Case — Inquiry by Competent Authority Valid. Departmental inquiry conducted by duly appointed Adhoc Disciplinary Authority under Notification dated 01.12.2003; charges of misappropriation and forgery of Rs.52,200 proved; dismissal and appellate orders upheld.
20 Feb 2014The petitioners, heirs and legal representatives of the original petitioner (deceased), filed a writ petition seeking to quash orders dated 24.04.2005...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.
30 Apr 2012The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Revision Applications Against Defamation Complaints — Complaints Under Section 499 IPC Not Barred by Limitation as Each Publication Constitutes a Separate Offence.
3 Mar 2005The applicant, Valmiki Faleiro, filed four criminal revision applications challenging the orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Margao, takin...
- 143
