Search Results for "Substantive appointment"

652 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 652 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Upholding Autonomy Amidst Settlement Disputes Exploring Legal Principles and Precedents in Arbitration Law

This Judgment pertains to a legal discussion surrounding arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"A Case Examining Limitation and Arbitration in Franchise Disputes."

The Supreme Court ruled on the issue of whether the arbitration petition filed by Arif Azim Co. Ltd. was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Compassionate Appointment Due to Delay and Laches. Claim for compassionate appointment rejected as application made seven years after employee's death was not maintainable under Railway Establishment Code.

The petitioners, Smt. Leelabai Yashwant Ghodke and another, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 21st July 2017 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Selection of Reader in Ayurvedic College — Selection Process Not Vitiated by Alleged Bias or Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Failed to Prove Bias or Mala Fides in Selection Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Dr. Rajeshkumar Prakashchandra Gupta, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Reappointment of District Forum Presidents Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Section 10(2) of the Act Prescribes a Single Term of Five Years or Until Age 65, Barring Reappointment.

The judgment addresses a common question arising in multiple writ petitions: whether the President of a District Forum constituted under Section 10 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Water Treatment Plant Contract Dispute. Arbitration Proceedings Conducted Under ICC Rules Were Valid Despite Corporation's Objection to Applicability of Rules.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 24 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ...