Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

321 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Magistrate to Dispose of Property Release Application in Seized Vehicle Case — Writ of Mandamus Issued for Speedy Adjudication Under BNSS, 2023. Court Held That Magistrate Must Decide Application Within Two Weeks, Emphasizing Speedy Disposal of Interim Applications Under Sections 497 and 503 of BNSS, 2023.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Mukesh Jain, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Naga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted by Calcutta High Court in Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case — CBI Investigation Undermined by Premature Release. Reverse Burden of Proof Under Section 436A CrPC Not Applicable Where Investigation Ongoing and Trial Not Commenced.

11 Dec 2025

The Supreme Court heard appeals by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) against the grant of bail to multiple accused persons in connection with ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MPID Act Case – Alleged Fraudulent Hosiery Scheme – No Discharge as Prima Facie Case Exists

2 May 2025

The appellant, Smt. Neelam Rajendra Nanaware, filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Fin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Auction Forfeiture Case — Earnest Money Deposit Forfeiture Upheld as Compensation for Breach of Contract. The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money deposit by a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is not subject to proof of actual loss and is governed by the terms of the auction contract, not Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872.

10 Aug 2022

The case involves two appeals by a nationalized bank (appellant) against a common judgment of the Madras High Court, which had allowed the writ petiti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Acquisition Cases — Non-Grant of Solatium and Interest Upheld. The Court held that Section 3J of the National Highways Act, 1956, excluding solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), considered the validity of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendants to File Written Statement Beyond 120 Days in Pre-2015 Commercial Suit. Mandatory timeline under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 does not apply retrospectively to suits filed before the Act and transferred to Commercial Division.

24 May 2019

The Bombay High Court addressed a preliminary legal question in a Notice of Motion arising from a Commercial Suit. The suit was originally filed in 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

8 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

8 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)