Search Results for "Section 61(1)"

205 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 205 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Levy of Entry Tax on Natural Gas Under Maharashtra Entry Tax Act, 2002 — Holds That Natural Gas Is Not 'Goods' for Entry Tax Purposes When Supplied Through Pipelines

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by companies (Deepak Fertilisers and Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd., Smartchem Technologies Ltd., Emp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Saleem Pasha, was convicted by the II Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in S.C.No.611/2010 for the offence punishabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu @ Rambhau Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Mahara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Duplicate Share Certificates Under Section 84(4) of Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Title Requires Civil Suit, Not Summary Company Application

The appellant, Rai Bahadur Gujarmal Modi & Bros. Pvt. Ltd., filed a company application under Section 84(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking duplic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order Allowing Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Inherent Power to Recall Witness Under Section 22 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, Deepak Kochhar and Rajeev Kochhar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...