Search Results for "Section 483 Companies Act"

66 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 66 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Promoter in PMLA Case Citing Long Incarceration and Delayed Trial. The court held that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA were not satisfied and that continued detention violated Article 21.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Arvind Dham, a former promoter and non-executive chairman of Amtek Auto Ltd., against the Delhi High Court's o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessees' Appeals in Interest Tax Dispute on Hire-Purchase Transactions. The interest component in hire-purchase instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974 as hire-purchase transactions are not loans or advances.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Muthoot Leasing and Finance Limited and other assessees, setting aside the judgment of the Kerala H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Assessees in Interest Tax Act Case on Hire-Purchase Instalments. Hire-purchase agreements are distinct from loans, and interest component in instalments is not taxable under Section 2(7) of the Interest-Tax Act, 1974, as it does not constitute interest on loans and advances.

The dispute involved a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax liability of non-banking finance and leasing companies under the Interest-Tax Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition by Foreign Shareholder Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 272(1)(e) Companies Act, 2013. Section 272(1)(e) is not ultra vires the Constitution; second proviso to Section 272(3) does not apply to petitions under Section 272(1)(e).

The petitioner, Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of Mauritius and a shareholder of Devas Multimedia Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Official Liquidator's Decision to Sell Company Assets as a Going Concern. Court Upholds Liquidator's Discretion Under Companies Act, 1956 to Reject Private Offers and Proceed with Public Auction for Maximizing Value.

The case involves a Company Appeal filed by the legal heirs of Umashankar Saraf and other family members against the Official Liquidator of M/s. Rai B...