Search Results for "Section 381 IPC"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Ocular Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Mangesh Sadanand Masane and Sadanand Namdev Masane (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) against their conviction an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in DJ Halli Riot Case — Cites Parity and Length of Incarceration. Appellant entitled to bail under Section 14-A of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 as co-accused already released and trial not likely to conclude soon.

The judgment concerns two criminal appeals filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 and 380 IPC. Appellants’ Conviction and Life Imprisonment Upheld Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together and Recovery of Stolen Ornaments.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction and sentence for the murder of the informant’s wife an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft by Clerk Under Section 381 IPC. Discovery of Stolen Property Under Section 27 Evidence Act Sufficient for Conviction in Absence of Direct Evidence.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Sunil Madhukar Morwal against his conviction under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for theft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kalu @ Mahindra Ravindra Waghmare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for offences under Sections 302, 427, and 451 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...