Search Results for "Section 378 CrPC"

345 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Private Complaints for Dishonour of Cheque Over Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Section 142(2) of NI Act Does Not Mandate Police Investigation, Private Complaint Maintainable.

The case involved a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 142(2) of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Complainant Failed to Prove That Accused Forged Documents or Cheated Him in Plot Sale Transaction Under Sections 420, 468, 471, 109 read with Section 34 IPC.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by the original informant, Sharad Bonde, and an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Caste-Based Intent. Property Dispute Leading to Assault and Abuse Does Not Attract Atrocities Act Without Specific Intent to Insult on Caste Grounds.

The appellants, Vinod Thakare, Varsha Thakare, and Aakash Thakare, filed an appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Victim's Appeal Against Acquittal Without Leave Requirement Under Section 372 CrPC. The Court held that the victim's right to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC is independent and does not require leave, distinguishing it from the State's appeal under Section 378 CrPC.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Naval Kishore Mishra, the brother of a deceased victim, against the High Court's dismissal of his appeal cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010422252008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Death Sentence Confirmation and Appeals against Conviction in 2000 Church Bomb Blast. Accused were convicted under Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A IPC by Trial Court for conspiracy and bomb blast at St. Peter and Paul Church, Bangalore.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard together a criminal reference for confirmation of death sentence and two criminal appeals arising from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application Challenging Maintainability of Appeal Against Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Complainant's Appeal Under Proviso to Section 372 CrPC Does Not Require Leave Under Section 378 CrPC.

The applicant, Madhav Shriramji Khadse, was the original accused in Summary Criminal Complaint No. 1288/2008 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instr...