Search Results for "Section 377"

511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony and Lack of Medical Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(d)(i)(n), 377, 323 IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Christian Rajendran, Joy Rajendran, and Salomi Rajendran against their conviction and sentence under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Strikes Down Caste-Based Discrimination in Prison Manuals as Unconstitutional. Prison Rules Dividing Labour and Segregating Barracks by Caste Violate Articles 14, 15, 17, 21, and 23 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Sukanya Shantha, a journalist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for the repeal of offendi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Modifies Conviction: Appeal Partly Allowed in POCSO and IPC Section 377 Case" "Insufficient evidence of penetration leads to reduced charges in sexual assault case"

The conviction under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act and Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The court partially a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Victim's Appeal for Enhancement of Sentence in Kidnapping and Murder Case. Victim Cannot Appeal Under Section 372 CrPC for Inadequate Sentence; Only State Government Can Seek Enhancement Under Section 377 CrPC.

The appellant, Parvinder Kansal, was the father of a deceased boy and the complainant in FIR No.742 of 2007 registered for offences under Section 364A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Encroachment and Possession Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Defendants' Encroachment on Plaintiffs' Land Upheld Based on Measurement and Revenue Records.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants challenging the concurrent findings and decree in R.C.A. No.65/2015 by the learned Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Section 377 Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Unnatural Sex and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Vishwas Somnath Bansode, was convicted by the Special Judge & District Judge-1, Pune under Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code and Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 377 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of POCSO Act set aside as testimonies of child victims were contradictory and unsupported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Navin Dhaniram Baraiye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special POCSO Case No. 218/2016 for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of respondents Shripati Rama Kanase, Annappa Shripati Kanase, and Appa Shripati Kanase in Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Unnatural Offence Under Section 377 IPC. Minor Inconsistencies in Evidence Do Not Warrant Interference in Revision as Testimony of Prosecutrix and Medical Evidence Support Conviction.

The applicant, Gulab s/o Shripat Sable, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Washim, for an offence under Section 377 of the Indian P...