Search Results for "Section 37(4)"

538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Upholds Commercial Court's Refusal to Set Aside Award. NCBS's challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 fails as no grounds under Section 34(2) established.

The National Centre for Biological Sciences (NCBS) filed an appeal under Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (A&C Act) agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Fails to Establish Membership of Unlawful Assembly or Common Object.

The case involves appeals against a conviction for murder and related offenses. The appellants were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363 and 376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Subramani, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kolar on 02.11.2018 in S.C.No.21/2017 for offences punis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of IA for Framing Additional Issues in Injunction Suit. Order 14 Rule 1 and 5 CPC does not mandate framing of issues on every factual controversy; only on material propositions of fact or law.

The petitioner, plaintiff in O.S. No.374/2016, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondents to restrain them from interfering with hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by three appellants against their conviction by the District Judge-7 & Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Probate Case for Non-Compliance with Section 281 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Mandatory Verification by Attesting Witness Not Provided, Leading to Dismissal of Probate Petition.

The appellant, Pralhad Ganpat Salgar, filed a Testamentary Suit No. 173 of 2017 seeking probate of a Will dated 07.04.2007 allegedly executed by the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Victim Compensation Appeals Under Section 357A CrPC — State Must Compensate Victims Even if Accused Acquitted or Untraced. The court held that victim compensation is a mandatory duty of the State, not dependent on conviction of the accused.

The judgment concerns four criminal appeals (Criminal Appeal Nos. 991, 992, 331, and 854 of 2011) heard together by the Bombay High Court. The appeals...