Search Results for "Section 364-A IPC"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Section 364A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand for ransom and threat beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a minor boy, Sumit, son of Shantaram Kumbhar (PW1), on 18th November 2002. The prosecution alleged that the app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court upheld life imprisonment under Section 364A IPC for kidnapping for ransom, relying on last seen evidence and recovery of victim's belongings despite non-recovery of dead body.

The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under Section 364A IPC for kidnapping a 5-6 year old child for ransom and sentenced to life imprisonment. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder in Section 364A IPC Case — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Victim's Body. Appellants' Appeal Dismissed as Prosecution Proved Chain of Circumstances Leading to Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping for ransom and subsequent murder of a 10-year-old boy, the son of a police constable. The appellants, Shashikant T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence for Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Unlawful Fixed Term Condition. Trial Court's Imposition of 30-Year Sentence Without Remission Held Beyond Jurisdiction Under Indian Penal Code, 1860, Following Precedent.

The Supreme Court addressed an appeal concerning the sentencing of two accused persons convicted for kidnapping for ransom and murder. The deceased, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Extortion Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 364A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand for Ransom.

The appellant, Lalit Vilasrao Thakare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (V), Nagpur in Sessions Case No.78 of 2013 for offences punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Process Against Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Inordinate Delay. Complaint Filed After Six Years Without Explanation Fails to Make Out Offences Under Sections 341, 342, 364A, 120(B) r/w 34 IPC.

The High Court of Karnataka at Kalaburagi considered a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC filed by four petitioners seeking to quash the order o...