Search Results for "Section 32M"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Section 32M"

24 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Petitioner's Long Possession as Tenant Does Not Bar Restoration.

2 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Hirakant Ramchandra Kothari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 23...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Landlords' Petition Against MRT Order Remanding Purchase Price Fixation in Tenancy Dispute. MRT Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Ordering De Novo Fixation Without Setting Aside ALT's Determination.

26 Jun 2014

The petitioners, landlords of agricultural lands, challenged an order dated 27 April 1992 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) in a revisi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Protection of Grazing Land and Water Pond for Village Cattle. Court Holds That Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Legal Right or Public Duty, and the Dispute Appears to Be Private in Nature.

8 Mar 2017

The petitioner, a farmer, filed a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to the State authorities to permit the use of land (new Gut No.38 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit Between Brothers — Document of Partition Dated 02.11.1970 Held to Cover All Suit Properties Including Survey No. 137, Setting Aside Appellate Decree. The court held that the lower appellate court's finding that Survey No. 137 was not covered by the partition deed was perverse and based on misreading of evidence, and the burden to prove exclusion was not discharged.

25 Jun 2015

The dispute in this second appeal arises from a partition suit between two real brothers, the plaintiff Arjun Gopal Govekar and the defendant Rajaram ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)