Search Results for "Section 304-A IPC"

92 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 92 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Mother-in-Law for Dowry Death Based on Dying Declaration. Third dying declaration naming appellant as perpetrator found voluntary and trustworthy, reversing trial court's acquittal.

The case pertains to the death of Urmila @ Guddi, who was married to Jagdish Singh (Proforma Respondent No.3) about four years prior to the incident. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Boat Owner in Bumper Ride Accident Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Petitioner not present at scene and no material to show rash or negligent act under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC.

The case arises from a tragic accident on 18 November 2010 at Calangute beach, Goa, where a bumper ride boat, while returning to shore, suddenly turne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Doctor in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent. Section 304 IPC not attracted as negligence was not gross or reckless, and death occurred during medical procedure without mens rea.

The applicant, Dr. Sangeeta Salunke, a registered medical practitioner, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheet Against Teachers in Student Death Case Due to Lack of Criminal Negligence. Section 304A IPC requires gross negligence and direct causation, not mere accident or civil liability.

The petitioners, teachers and the secretary of Mother Theresa School, sought quashing of the charge sheet in C.C. No.1505/2012 pending before the Prin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits KSRTC Driver in Road Accident Case Due to Lack of Rash or Negligent Driving Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Culpable Rashness or Negligence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammad Hanif Jainum Khalifa, was a driver employed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC). He was tried and convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Under Section 302 IPC — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient. Chain of Circumstances Pointed Only to Guilt of Accused, Appeal Dismissed.

The appellant, Gulabsing Sureshsing Sisodiya, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of the deceased. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored

The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed for Police Constable Who Shot Colleague Over Phone Dispute. Use of Deadly Weapon and Absence of Sudden Quarrel Preclude Application of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

The appellant, Arvind Kumar, a police constable, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of fellow constable Mohd. Rashid. The incident occ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries in Hit-and-Run Case. Revision Petitioner's Conviction Under Sections 279, 337, 304A IPC and Section 134(a)(b) r/w 187 MV Act Confirmed as Evidence of Rashness and Negligence Was Clear.

The revision petitioner, Mr. Vimanjan Hanumanta Devarkonda, was the original accused in a criminal case arising from a road accident that occurred on ...