Search Results for "Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act"

176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Daily Wage Workers by Municipal Council. Held that termination without notice and without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by daily wage workers employed by the Municipal Council, Bhusawal. The petitioners were engaged ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Retrenchment Dispute. Retrenchment of 12 Liftmen Held Illegal as Management Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service and Compliance with Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Welcomgroup Searock, which manages the Searock Hotel in Bandra, Mumbai, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 15th Febr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages for Termination Without Enquiry. Violation of Sections 25F and 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Found as Employee Was Not Given Notice or Compensation and Principle of Last Come First Go Was Not Followed.

The case involves a challenge by the petitioners (the Principal of Industrial Training Institute, Khamgaon, and the Joint Director of Vocational Educa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Holding Retrenchment as Unfair Labour Practice. Non-compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act renders retrenchment illegal and amounts to unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Shekoba Auto Private Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, was engaged in the manufacture of automobile ignition...