Search Results for "Section 255 IPC"

89 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 89 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Conspiracy Case Under IPC Sections 120B and 302 Read with 34 Due to Insufficient Evidence and Inconsistencies. Appeals Allowed Setting Aside Trial Court Conviction

The High Court of Karnataka allowed criminal appeals filed by five accused persons, acquitting them of charges under Section 120B of IPC for conspirac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cyber Stalking Case: E-mails Lacking Sexual Content Do Not Attract Section 67 of IT Act or Sections 354, 509, 506 IPC. Court holds that vulgar language without lascivious intent or threat of injury does not constitute obscenity or criminal intimidation.

The Petitioner, Joseph Paul de Sousa, sought quashing of FIR No. 30 of 2009 registered with the Cyber Cell, Mumbai, for offenses under Sections 354, 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Army Offence Jurisdiction Dispute, Restoring Sessions Court Trial. Concurrent Jurisdiction Under Section 125 of Army Act, 1950 Upheld, with Commanding Officer's Discretion Exercised Through Cooperation with Civil Investigation.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Sikkim, which upheld an order of the Sessions Judge directing that the accused, an Army personne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction Under Section 304-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That the Accident Was Caused by the Accused's Rash or Negligent Driving.

The case pertains to a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, K.M. Appachu, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Wife's Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Including Extra-Judicial Confession and Blood-Stained Clothes Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sitaram Dattu Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli for the murder of his wife under Section 302 of the Indian...