Search Results for "Section 20A"

60 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees of National Textile Corporation Ltd. — Petitioners Not Employees of NTC Ltd. as They Were Appointed by Contractors and No Employer-Employee Relationship Established.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by Shilpa S. Chandankar and Priyanka Pradeep Chavan against the National Textile Corporation Ltd. (NTC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 305(6) CrPC for Appointment as Company Representative. The court held that the trial court's order doubting the genuineness of resignation was unsustainable and directed fresh consideration.

The petitioner, Krishnaswamy Sridhar, was accused No.4 in Special C.C. No.245/2002 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.

The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Section 64 of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 Barring Legal Practitioners from Appearing Before College Tribunal. Section 64 is Not Repugnant to Advocates Act, 1961 as Section 30 Thereof is Not in Force and Tribunal is Not a Court.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging Section 64 of the Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, which bars legal practitioners from appeari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Upheld as Circumstantial Evidence, Including Motive and Last Seen Together, Formed Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt.

The appellant, Raju Shankar Shete, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Alka Bhise by the Sessions J...