KAHC010069912016_1
10 Nov 2016...
Search Results for "Section 185 Motor Vehicles Act"
107 result(s) found
Found 107 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal Alleging Vehicle Planting in Motor Accident Claim, Partially Allows Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation. The Court held that mere suspicion of vehicle planting without evidence cannot absolve the insurer, and enhanced compensation by applying a higher notional income and future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
30 Jan 2013The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition (MVC No.7322/2007) before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Banga...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Vehicle Planting Allegation Not Proven, Compensation Enhanced. The Court held that mere suspicion of vehicle planting without evidence cannot absolve the Insurance Company of liability under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and enhanced compensation for injuries.
30 Jan 2013The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim petition (MVC No.7322/2007) before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Banga...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Driver in Culpable Homicide Case Involving Twelve Fatalities at Procession. Drunk Driving at High Speed Under Knowledge of Likely Death Falls Under Section 304 Part II IPC, Not Mere Rashness Under Section 304A.
19 Aug 2013The appellant, a truck driver, was convicted by the trial court under Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code along with other sections for causi...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.
10 Nov 2016The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Driver's Invalid License. Pay and Recover Principle Applied as Insurer Must Compensate Third Party and Recover from Owner.
19 Dec 2019The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the respondent no.1 (original applicant) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Pune. ...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Absence of Grievous Injury. Court holds that mere dragging of police officer by vehicle without intention to kill does not constitute attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC.
9 Mar 2020The petitioner, Dnyaneshwar Arjun Suryawanshi, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of ...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition by Legal Heirs and Subsequent Purchaser Challenging District Registrar's Order Directing Registration of Sale Deed. Petitioners Contend Appeal Filed After Five Years Was Barred by Limitation and District Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction Under Section 72 of the Registration Act, 1908.
11 Feb 2026The dispute centered on a sale deed dated 18.02.1988 that was presented for registration but refused by the Sub-Registrar for non-production of the in...
- 31
High Court
High Court Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Death and Injury — Negligence of Truck Driver Proved, Insurance Company Liable to Pay. The Court held that the Tribunal erred in applying contributory negligence and in assessing quantum, and enhanced compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
7 Jul 2022The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 22.12.1990 involving a scooter and a truck. The deceased, Manmathappa Patwari, was riding pilli...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — No Contributory Negligence and Multiplier of 15 Upheld. Deceased pedestrian aged 45 years; Tribunal's award under Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 confirmed as appellant failed to prove contributory negligence and multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma.
6 May 2013The appellant, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Limited (MSRTC), owner of a ST bus involved in an accident, challenged the award of compen...
- 164
