Search Results for "Section 163A"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A, Corrects Multiplier Error. No Fault Liability Provision Does Not Require Proof of Negligence; Multiplier Must Be Based on Victim's Age.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the mother of a 28-year-old deceased who was a pillion rider. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Application of Burden of Proof Under Section 163A MV Act. Claimant's Failure to Prove Negligence Not a Ground for Dismissal Under No-Fault Liability Scheme.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court dated 27.09.2022, which affirmed the dismissal of a claim petition filed by the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 16 for Deceased Aged 38 Years. Future Prospects and Conventional Heads Enhanced as Per Sarla Verma and Pranay Sethi Guidelines.

The appellants, legal representatives of deceased Shrimant Ghuge, filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partially Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act — Reduces Future Prospects and Non-Pecuniary Damages. The structured formula under the Second Schedule does not permit future prospects or excessive non-pecuniary damages.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, by the legal representatives of the dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Police Constable in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A Motor Vehicles Act. Permanent Disability of 45% Leads to Recalculation of Compensation Using Multiplier Method, Setting Aside Inadequate Tribunal Award.

The appellant, Vilas Bagde, a police constable, was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 23 January 1995 when a jeep dashed his scooter. He sustaine...