Search Results for "Section 124-A"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Deceased's Own Negligence Not a Bar to Compensation Under Railways Act, 1989. Held that 'untoward incident' includes accidental falls from trains regardless of passenger negligence, relying on Jameela v. Union of India.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Firdaus Kausar, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, after their daughter died on 4.2.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger Despite Wrong Train. Identification of Deceased by Son Through Belongings Sufficient Under Railways Act, 1989.

The appeal was filed by the legal heirs of deceased Motiram Meshram against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, which rejected their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Sets Aside Tribunal's Finding of Rashness. Death of Passenger Falling from Train at Station Held to be 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 124A of the Indian Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, being the widow and sons of the deceased Vikram Darkonde, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal seeking compens...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Mother of Deceased Entitled to Compensation Under Railways Act. Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Ground of Non-Existence of Deceased as Passenger, Despite Evidence of Accidental Fall from Train.

The appellant, Ranjanabai Tukaram Jatale, mother of deceased Suresh Tukaram Jatale, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Train Accident Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Amputation of Leg Due to Fall from Train Held as 'Accidental Falling' from Train Carrying Passengers.

The appellant, Ramesh Istari @ Istaru Kore, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, alleging that on 24.2.2016, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Compensation Claim for Untoward Incident Death. Claimants' Failure to Prove Bona Fide Passenger Status Not Fatal as Railway Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, through the General Manager of Central Railway, challenging a judgment and award passed by the Rail...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Development Charge Levy in Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act. The court held that the levy is a fee for services rendered and not a tax, and the amendment is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, The Solapur Promoters and Builders Association Society and another, challenged the constitutional validity of the Maharashtra Regiona...