Search Results for "Section 124 Customs Act"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Penalties on Customs Broker for Importer's Misdeclaration — No Mens Rea or Knowledge of Fraud Established. Section 112(a), 112(b), 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 require active involvement or knowledge for penalty imposition on customs broker.

The petitioner, M/s. Mathuradas Narandas and Sons Forwarders Ltd., a customs broker, was engaged by GKR Traders Pvt. Ltd., the importer, to facilitate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Order-in-Original for Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Denied Cross-Examination Opportunity Under Section 138B of Customs Act, 1962. The court held that denial of cross-examination vitiates the proceedings and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

The petitioner, Shri Bipin Badani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Lithium Ion Cells for Want of Show Cause Notice; Section 124 Customs Act, 1962 Mandates Prior Hearing. Non-Compliance with Natural Justice Renders Confiscation Order Void, Liberty Granted to Seek Release of Detained Goods.

Background: The petitioner, a subsidiary of Bajaj Auto Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture and sale of electric scooters and imported consignments of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Customs Detention Order in Smart Plug Import Dispute — No Import Licence Required Under WPC Rules. Court holds that smart plugs without Wi-Fi or Bluetooth capability do not require import licence under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 or WPC Rules, and directs release of goods.

The petitioner, SYSKA LED Lights Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in import and manufacture of light products, imported smart plugs vide Bill of Entry No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Customs Duty Exemption Case for Hospital Equipment. Condition of Free Treatment Under Notification No.64/1988-Cus. Must Be Strictly Complied With for Exemption.

The applicant, M/s National Heart Centre & Hypertension Clinic, through its Director Dr. Shashank Bhalchandra Subhedar, imported a Computerized Stress...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026

The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...