Search Results for "Section 10(29)"

44 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 44 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Sections 4 and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 376(2)(i) and 376(2)(j) IPC set aside as prosecution could not establish minority of victim.

The appellant, Maherban Hasan Babu Khan, was convicted by the Special Court at Mangaon, District Raigad, for offences under Sections 4 and 6 of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand for Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Special Court (ACB), Nagpur, dated 6th April 2009, which acquitted the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 21(5) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1989 Allowing Non-Judicial Member as President of Tribunal. Challenge to Appointment of IAS Officer as President Dismissed as Provision Does Not Violate Basic Structure.

The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and its President filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses ESIC Appeal, Holds Hospital Not a Factory Under ESI Act. Pathological laboratory performing diagnostic tests does not constitute a manufacturing process under Section 2(12)(a) of the Employees State Insurance Act, 1948.

The case involves an appeal by the Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) against an order of the ESI Court, Nagpur, which set aside a communica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Transfer of MCOC Case to Sessions Court for Lack of Jurisdiction — Offence Not Under MCOC Act. Special Court Correctly Found No Organized Crime Syndicate or Continuing Unlawful Activity Under Section 2(1)(e) and Section 3 of MCOC Act.

The case involves two appeals against an order dated 7th October 2011 passed by the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act...