Search Results for "Saurashtra Rules"

116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Bidi Factory Manager Under Factories Act, 1948 Due to Lack of Employer Control Over Workers. Sattedars and Their Coolies Held Not to Be 'Workers' Under Section 2(1) as Factory Management Lacked Control and Supervision Over Manner of Work.

The appellants were the manager of a bidi factory operating under contracts with Sattedars, independent contractors who agreed to supply bidis manufac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds BCCI's Amenability to Writ Jurisdiction and Applies Public Law Principles to Direct Structural Reforms. Lodha Committee Recommendations for Amending BCCI's Memorandum of Association and Rules to Prevent Conflict of Interest and Ensure Transparency Considered.

The Supreme Court of India, in a sequel to its earlier order dated 22 January 2015 in BCCI v. Cricket Association of Bihar, considered the report and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Summary Suit — Defendant's Vague Defence of Security Cheques Not a Triable Issue. The court upheld the decree for Rs.61,00,000/- with interest under Order 37 CPC, as the defendant failed to disclose a plausible defence.

The respondent/plaintiff, Pravin Hiralal Shah, filed a summary suit against the appellant/defendant, Rajesh Laxmichand Udeshi @Bhatia, for recovery of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Industrial Dispute Reference Due to Procedural Irregularity in Conciliation Initiation Under Industrial Disputes Act

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Appellants challenging the reference of industrial dispute to Industrial Court, Aurangabad -- The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...