Search Results for "SAIL Rules"

64 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 64 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Widow's Petition for Lump Sum Compensation in Lieu of Compassionate Appointment Due to Lack of Educational Qualification. Court Directs Payment of Rs. 3,00,000/- Under Government Resolution Dated 05.07.2011 for Death in Harness of Government Servant.

The petitioner, Gitaben Jagdishbhai Vaghela, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Lump-Sum Compensation in Lieu of Compassionate Appointment Due to Policy Change. Petitioner's Application for Compassionate Appointment Kept Pending for Years; Court Directs Payment Under Revised Government Resolution with Interest.

The petitioner, Jay Rajendrakumar Trivedi, filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 16, and 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction for c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petitions for Compassionate Appointment in Judgment -- Family Financial Status Under Government Resolution Defeats Claims Despite Death in Harness

The High Court of Gujarat dismissed petitions filed by Tinuben Rameshbhai Chaudhary seeking compassionate appointment after her father's death while i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Additional Documents in Civil Suit — Belated Filing to Fill Lacuna Not Permitted. Trial court's discretion to reject application for producing resolution and letter of authority during cross-examination upheld as no justifiable cause shown.

The petitioners, M/s. BGC International Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Balaji Pothraj, were defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 22/2007/A filed by the respondents...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Production of Additional Documents in Civil Suit — Emphasizes Liberal Approach Under CPC Order 13 Rule 1. The Court held that mere delay or suspicion of afterthought is not sufficient to reject documents if no prejudice is caused and cross-examination is ongoing.

The petitioners, defendants in a civil suit for refund of advance of Rs.30 lakhs, filed an application during cross-examination of their witness (DW.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Injury Not Arising Out of Employment. Seaman's Back Injury While Shifting Food Boxes Held Not Covered Under Section 3 of Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 as Injury Did Not Arise Out of and in Course of Employment.

The case involves an appeal by M/s Denklay Marine Services Ltd. and M/s Orinoco Marine Consultancy India Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment and order date...