Search Results for "Rule 330"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Rule 330"

375 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 375 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Declaration Under Section 6 Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitles Landowner to Restoration of Possession.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land situated at Satara for the purpose of road widening. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petition Due to Non-Application of Correct Market Value. Petitioner's Land Acquired in 2008 for Satara Municipal Council, Court Directs Recalculation Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, owned land in Satara that was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the Satara Municipal Council under the Land Acq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitlement to Restoration of Possession.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the acq...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Case Due to Non-Examination of Key Witness and Adverse Inference Under Section 114(g) of Evidence Act. Sale Deed in Favour of Plaintiffs Proved Valid, Subsequent Transfers by Vendor After Losing Title Held Void.

9 Mar 2026

The present First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the appellants-original plaintiffs challenging the judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoters' Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA — Upholds Competent Authority's Order Including Recreational Ground Area. The Court held that the Competent Authority's order under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 was valid and the petitioners' objections regarding excess land and right of way were not sustainable.

24 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd., Rajesh Himatlal, and Wonder Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Sanction. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

25 Apr 2019

The present appeal was filed by Vinayak Raghunath Wakle, who was convicted by the learned Special Judge, Aurangabad, in Special Case No. 8 of 1998 for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Officers in Custodial Violence Case Due to Limitation Bar Under Section 161 of Bombay Police Act, 1951. Prosecution for Offences Under Sections 330, 324, 323, 354, 166 IPC Filed Beyond Six Months from Date of Incident Held Not Maintainable.

22 Jan 2015

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of two police officers, Sheshrao Thombre (ASI) and Kacharu Rengade (Police Constable), who wer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Injunction Order in Property Dispute Between Co-Owners. Court upholds trial court's discretion to grant temporary injunction restraining alienation of jointly owned properties pending suit for partition and permanent injunction.

29 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Akhil Mansuklal Mehta, and the respondent, Sheetal Deepak Karamchandani, jointly purchased three properties between 1996 and 1998: (1)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Octroi on Computer Software in Classification Dispute. Software Held to Be Separate Goods from Hardware Under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 and Octroi Rules.

11 Oct 2005

The petitioner, Tata Information Systems Ltd. (now IBM Global Services India Private Limited), was engaged in the manufacture, import, sale, and marke...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)