Search Results for "Representation Disposal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Representation Disposal"

1487 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1487 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reinstates Two Women Judicial Officers Terminated During Probation in Madhya Pradesh — Termination Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Recruitment Rules. The Court held that termination based on adverse remarks without opportunity of hearing violates Article 311 and Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service Rules, 1994.

7 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated three connected matters concerning the termination of six women judicial officers (Civil Judges, Junior Divisio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Delay of 13 Days in Deciding Detenu's Representation Violates Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5) and Section 8(1) of MPDA Act, 1981.

17 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Vinod Dhannulal Jaiswal, challenged an order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad (respondent No.1) u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Illegal Disposal of Seized Gold Jewellery Without Notice and Before Confiscation Order. Customs Authorities Directed to Pay Current Market Value for 1028 Grams of Gold Disposed in Violation of Section 111 of Customs Act, 1962 and Article 300A of Constitution.

21 Dec 2023

The petitioners, Leyla Mohmoodi and Mojtaba Ebrahim Gholami, through their constituted attorney, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Representation Remained Unattended for Over Three Months, Violating Constitutional Safeguard Under Article 22(5).

6 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Premchand @ Babu Punjabi @ Tatu Manohar Dhakani, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Internal Reservation for Backward Classes in Tamil Nadu - The Court reversed the High Court's declaration of unconstitutionality, holding that sub-classification within Most Backward Classes and Denotified Communities is permissible under Articles 15(4) and 16(4) of the Constitution of India, 1950, based on commission recommendations and historical data.

31 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the Tamil Nadu Special Reservation of seats in Educational Institutions including Private Educational Institutions and of appoi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions for Premature Release of Life Convicts in NDPS Act Cases — Held That Detention Beyond 14 Years Without Consideration of Remission Is Illegal. The court directed the state to consider premature release under the remission policy dated 10.02.2010 and Section 433A CrPC.

13 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Bandu Shivaji More, Prashant Krushandev Jadhav, and Satyawan Mahadev Suryavanshi, were convicted for offences under the Narcotic Drug...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Prevention of Black Marketing Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation and Non-Placement of Chemical Analyser Report. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Vital Document Not Placed Before Detaining Authority and Representation Not Considered Promptly Under Section 3(1) read with Section 3(2)(b) of the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.

28 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Ismail Nasruddin Shaikh, challenged an order dated 14th October 2012 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, directing his dete...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under M.P.A.D. Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Considering Representation. Detenu's Right to Speedy Consideration of Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated, Detention Order Quashed.

16 Aug 2005

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Iqbal @ Shembdya Iqbal @ Iqbal Jogeshwari Mohammed Hussain Mandal, filed a writ petition under Article 226...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay in Execution and Consideration of Representation. Delay of Over Five Months in Executing Detention Order and Three Months in Considering Representation Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act.

2 Feb 2005

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohd. Kunhi Kallattra, challenged a detention order dated 28.2.2002 issued by the Secretary (Preventive Detenti...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)