Search Results for "Rash Driving"

985 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 985 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Discharge of Accused in School Van Accident Case — No Prima Facie Case of Rash or Negligent Driving. Court holds that mere involvement in an accident does not establish rash or negligent driving under Sections 279, 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act.

The present criminal revision was filed by the complainant, Ashok Tarachand Ramteke, challenging the order of the Sessions Judge, Wardha, who discharg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence. Negligence of Driver Established Through Oral Testimony and Site Inspection Report, Entitling Claimant to Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laximan Vithoba Gaunkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Motor Accident Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Rash Driving. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 279, 337, 338 IPC and Section 184 Motor Vehicles Act as No Evidence of Rash or Negligent Driving Was Adduced.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal under Section 378(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order dated 16 April 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition, Discharges Accused in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge or Intent. Court holds that mere involvement in a road accident without evidence of rash or negligent driving does not attract Section 304 Part II IPC.

The revision petitioner, Kolla Bhovi, was the driver of a lorry involved in a road accident on 20.01.2013, resulting in the death of a cyclist. The co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Motor Accident Claims — Negligence of Maruti Van Driver Upheld. Compensation Awarded to Legal Heirs of Deceased Rider and Injured Pillion Riders Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case involves three appeals filed by The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. against judgments and awards of the Claims Tribunal, Raigad, in three motor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case — Negligent Driving Resulting in Death and Injuries Justifies Dismissal; Labour Court's Reinstatement Order Quashed as Perverse Under Section 11A of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which had set asi...