Search Results for "Railway Protection Force Rules"

154 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 154 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail of Accused in Interstate Child Trafficking Case Due to Perverse High Court Orders and Absconding Accused. Bail Granted Without Considering Gravity of Offences Under Sections 363, 311, 370(5) IPC and Organized Nature of Racket.

The Supreme Court dealt with a series of appeals filed by victims' families seeking cancellation of bail granted by the Allahabad High Court to 13 acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Convicts in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Procedural Violations in Search and Seizure Lead to Acquittal of Appellants Convicted Under Section 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellants, Pratap Bhimsingh Parera, Gangadhar Babaji Lenaka, Mrs. Savita Pratap Parera, and Mrs. Santoshi Santosh Pradhan, were convicted by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Protection Force Dismissal Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Disciplinary Authority's Disagreement with Inquiry Officer Without Hearing Employee Invalidates Dismissal Under Railway Protection Force Act, 1957.

The respondent, Amar Bahadur Singh, was appointed as a 'Rakshak' in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) of the Central Railway in 1960. On 15 April 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Part, Upholds Reinstatement but Reduces Back Wages to 25% in School Tribunal Termination Case. Employee's Cross-Appeal for Full Back Wages Dismissed as Termination Found Justified on Merits but Procedural Defect in Enquiry.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a dispute between an employer trust and an employee regarding termination of service. The em...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of RPF Constable for Dog's Bite Incident — Holds That Disciplinary Authority Cannot Impose Higher Punishment Without Providing Opportunity of Hearing to Delinquent Under Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968.

The petitioner, a constable in the Railway Protection Force (RPF) working as a dog handler of a dog named 'Rover', was subjected to disciplinary proce...