Search Results for "Railway Property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Railway Property"

741 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 741 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger Doctrine Applied. Claimants entitled to compensation as deceased was a bona fide passenger holding a valid ticket, rebutting the presumption of negligence under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

20 Mar 2025

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a claim petition by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in OA No. II U 162/2012 dated 14.12.2016. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

15 Nov 2019

The appeals arise from a common judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur in Sessions Case No. 75 of 199...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

19 Sep 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Railway Property Theft Case. Prosecution Failed to Prove Theft of Railway Property, Hence Possession Alone Not Sufficient for Conviction Under Section 3(a) of Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966.

9 May 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed two appeals against a common judgment dated 04.06.2001 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Railway Court, Pu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Protection as Slum Occupants on Railway Land — Slum Act Does Not Apply to Central Government Premises Under Article 285(1) of Constitution. The court held that the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 is inapplicable to railway property, and eviction is governed by the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioners, occupants of railway land in Mumbai, filed writ petitions seeking a declaration that they are 'protected occupiers' under the Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Protection as Slum Occupiers Against Railway Eviction — Slum Act Does Not Apply to Central Government Premises Under Article 285(1) of Constitution. The court held that the Maharashtra Slum Act cannot override the Public Premises Act in respect of Railway property, and petitioners cannot claim protected occupier status.

23 Jan 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions and several interlocutory applications filed by occupants of Railway land in Mumbai. The petitioners in Writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Direction to Consider Compassionate Appointment for Son of Deceased Railway Employee. CAT Erred in Refusing to Follow Railway Board Circular on Second Marriage as Upheld by Bombay High Court.

1 Apr 2016

The Union of India (Railways) filed a writ petition challenging orders dated 6 March 2014 and 26 August 2014 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Stamp Duty Order in Seawoods Project Development Agreement — Lease Deed Not Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that a development agreement-cum-lease deed executed by CIDCO for a 60-year term is a lease, not a conveyance, and is chargeable under Article 36 of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.

28 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Larsen and Toubro Ltd and its subsidiary, challenged an order dated 16 July 2011 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Employee for Unauthorized Occupation of Railway Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Title or Permission for Construction, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition.

22 Aug 2006

The petitioner, B.S. Rath, joined Western Railway as an Apprentice on 15th February 1965 and later became a Senior Motorman. He was charged with unaut...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Land Acquisition Officer and Railway Corporation Seeking Reduction of Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired for Konkan Railway. Court Upholds Reference Court's Award Based on Sale Deeds and Potential Value of Land, Finding No Error in Determination of Market Value.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (South Goa) and the Chief Engineer of Konkan Railway Corporatio...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)