Search Results for "Provident fund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Provident fund"

651 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 651 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Payment of Provident Fund Dues from Bank Sale Proceeds. Section 11(2) of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 creates a first charge over assets of the establishment, overriding the claims of a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act.

16 Jun 2026

The petitioner, the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-I, Employees' Provident Fund Organisation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 o...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows EPFO Board's Appeal, Holds Board is 'Aggrieved Person' Under Article 226. The Board, as a party before the EPF Appellate Tribunal, has locus standi to challenge the Tribunal's order by way of writ petition.

29 Apr 2026

The Central Board of Trustees, Employees Provident Fund (EPFO), represented by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Coimbatore, filed a writ a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows EPFO's Writ Petitions Against Educational Institution and Financial Company for Non-Compliance with Provident Fund Dues. EPF Act Sections 7A and 7B Proceedings Upheld as Proper Exercise of Quasi-Judicial Authority.

16 Dec 2025

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by the Central Board of Trustee, Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) against M/s. Saket Coll...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows EPFO Appeal Against HMT Limited in Provident Fund Dues Recovery Case — Establishes That Public Sector Undertakings Are Not Exempt from EPF Act Coverage and Recovery Proceedings. The Court Held That the EPF Act Applies to All Establishments Covered Under Section 1(3) and That the Respondent's Financial Difficulties Do Not Bar Recovery of Statutory Dues.

27 Jun 2023

The case involves an appeal filed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and the Recovery Officer of the Employees' Provident Fund Organization (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging EPF Liability Assessment Under Section 7A of EPF Act — Upholds Tribunal's Order Confirming Recovery of Rs. 67,67,178 for Non-Production of Records. The court held that when an establishment fails to produce records despite repeated opportunities, the authorities are justified in making a best judgment assessment based on available material.

11 Dec 2018

The petitioner, M/s Vardhaman Construction, a proprietary concern engaged in government construction contracts, challenged an order dated 15-12-2016 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officials in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Directors/Officers Not Liable for Offences Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Without Specific Allegations of Role in Transaction.

8 Mar 2016

The case involves three criminal writ petitions filed by directors and officers of the Sangli District Primary Teachers Co-operative Bank Ltd. seeking...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

10 Feb 2016

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant Gopal Gadhave (accused no.1) was convicte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner in EPF Act Case — Company Entitled to Infancy Period. Functional integrality not established between two companies despite common ownership; Section 16(1)(d) of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 applies to newly set up establishment.

7 Jul 2011

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Nagpur, challenging the order of the Employees' Provident Fund A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging EPF Attachment Over SFC Sale Property. Section 11(2) of EPF Act, 1952 creates overriding first charge on assets, enforceable against purchaser in SFC sale, not limited to insolvency or winding up.

28 Mar 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Indus Agro Products, was a purchaser in a sale conducted by the State Financial Corporation under the State Financial Corporation...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner in Damages Levy Case Under Section 14B of EPF Act — Delay in Payment of Provident Fund Dues Attracts Damages Irrespective of Financial Difficulties. Financial Hardship Not a Valid Defence for Delayed Provident Fund Contributions Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

22 Jun 2005

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner (RPFC) appealed against a Single Judge order that set aside notices/orders dated 17.7.1990 and 24.6.1992 levy...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)