Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "Presumption Under Section 139"

345 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonoured Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Restoring Complaint for Trial. The Court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Act regarding legally enforceable debt is rebuttable only at trial, not at pre-trial stage, and the basic ingredients under Section 138 were prima facie satisfied.

7 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, by the appellant against the second respondent, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Contradictory Evidence and Failure to Rebut Presumption. Appellant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as cheque was issued as security and loan transaction not reflected in income tax returns.

1 Jan 2024

The appellant, Sri Dattatraya, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) against the respondent, Sharanappa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals in Dishonour of Cheque Cases, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of NI Act applies when signature and issuance of cheque are admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut.

27 Jan 2022

The appellant, Mr. Ashfaq Rasheed Shaik, filed six criminal appeals under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. against the judgment of acquittal dated 07.06.2018 pa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case: Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Rebutted by Preponderance of Probabilities. The Court held that the High Court erred in reversing the trial court's acquittal without proper reasoning, as the accused had successfully rebutted the presumption of a legally enforceable debt.

8 Dec 2021

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K.S. Ranganatha against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court, which had reversed the trial court's a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Conviction of Accused in Dishonour of Cheque Case Under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The High Court Erred in Setting Aside Concurrent Conviction by Questioning Payment of Consideration Despite Admitted Signatures and Statutory Presumptions Under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a transaction where the respondent agreed to sell a house to the appellant for Rs. 4,00,000, with an advance of Rs. 3,50,0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal on Grounds of Improper Appreciation of Evidence and Reverses Finding of Duress. The Court held that the defence of cheque issued under force was not proved and the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was not rebutted.

20 Dec 2019

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the original complainant, Girdharilal Agrawal, against the acquittal of the accused-respondents (State of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption under Sections 118(a) and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 held to be in favour of complainant unless rebutted by accused.

4 Feb 2016

The appellant, Sachin Food Processor, a registered partnership firm, filed a criminal complaint against the respondent, Sanjay T. Pathak, under Sectio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant's claim of loan advanced to friend fails as no legally enforceable debt existed, leading to acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

16 Jul 2015

The appellant, Shri Datta S. Nadkarni, filed a criminal appeal challenging the acquittal of the first respondent, Mr. Salvador Fernandes, from an offe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Reverses Acquittal and Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 operates in favour of the complainant once the signature on the cheque is admitted, and the accused failed to rebut the presumption of legally enforceable debt.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, Krishna P. Morajkar, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, which set aside the convict...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court held that the accused failed to rebut the presumption that the cheques were issued for a legally enforceable debt, and the trial court's acquittal was erroneous.

19 Oct 2006

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the complainant, Shanaz D'Souza, against the acquittal of the accused, Sheikh Ameer Saheeb, under Section...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)