Search Results for "Pollution norms"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Pollution norms"

124 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

24 Dec 2025

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Madras Converts Writ Petition into Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation for Investigation into Illegal Beach Sand Mining. The Court Clarifies that the Scope Covers All Beach Sand Minerals and that Amendments to MMDR Act, 1957 and Atomic Concession Rules, 2016 Do Not Render the PIL Infructuous for the Period Prior to 2016.

17 Feb 2025

The case originated as a writ petition filed by Dr. G. Victor Rajamanickam concerning allegations of massive illegal mining and sale of Beach Sand Min...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

24 Sep 2024

The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Institutionalizes Central Empowered Committee as Permanent Statutory Body Under Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. The Court approved a notification constituting the CEC for monitoring compliance of environmental orders and directed that dissenting opinions be reported to ensure transparency.

31 Jan 2024

The judgment arises from the Supreme Court's ongoing supervision in the T.N. Godavarman case concerning environmental protection. The Central Empowere...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Closure Order Against Distillery in Pollution Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Maharashtra Pollution Control Board's order under Sections 33-A and 31-A of Water and Air Acts set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice and failure to consider petitioner's reply.

19 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Baramati Agro Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is engaged in manufacturing sugar, allied products, and ethano...

High Court

High Court Quashes Cognizance Order in Air Pollution Case Due to Lack of Sanction — Prosecution under Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 Requires Prior Sanction Under Section 43 for Board Complaints Filed Without Authorization.

2 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Sri B.V. Byregowda, proprietor of M/s Chennakeshava Stone Crushers, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NGT Order Dismissing Suo Moto Application on Environmental Violations by Stone Crushers. The Court held that the NGT erred in dismissing the application without adjudication on merits, as environmental laws apply to existing units and require compliance, and remitted the matter for a fresh speaking order.

18 Nov 2021

The dispute involved environmental violations by two stone crusher units operated by respondents in Village Fatta Bangar, Haldwani, Nainital District,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Residents' Challenge to Pollution Control Board's Consent for Home Products Industry — Conditional Consent Upheld as Reasonable and in Public Interest. The court held that the Board had imposed adequate safeguards to mitigate pollution and that the decision was not arbitrary under the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981.

18 Mar 2015

The petitioners, six residents of Hiriyur town in Chitradurga district, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India c...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Seeking Closure of Oil Tanking Activity for Lack of Credible Evidence of Environmental Violation. Court holds that mere apprehension of harm without concrete proof of violation of environmental norms or statutory conditions does not warrant closure of a lawful industrial activity.

22 Jan 2015

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by M/s. Nitol Jinn Trust and Mr. Peter Dias against the Union of India, State of Goa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of PIL on Noise Pollution Citing Supreme Court Directions. Court directs strict enforcement of Noise Pollution Rules and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, and mandates compliance with Supreme Court's comprehensive guidelines on firecrackers, loudspeakers, and silence zones.

24 Aug 2005

The Bombay High Court disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Janhit Manch and others seeking enforcement of legal provisions for cont...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)