Search Results for "Patents Act, 1970"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Patents Act, 1970"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal in Patent Infringement Case — Rejects Challenge to Maintainability of Suit. Court holds that a suit for infringement of a patent is maintainable even if the patent is not registered under the Designs Act, 2000, as long as it qualifies as a patent under the Patents Act, 1970.

15 Dec 2025

The appellant, M/s. Permanent Magnets Limited, filed a suit for infringement of its patent against the respondent, Mahipat Yadav. The respondent filed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Copyright Groundless Threat Suit — Restrains Defendant from Publishing Defamatory Statements Alleging Copyright Infringement. Court holds that Section 60 of Copyright Act, 1957 provides a remedy against groundless threats and that an interim injunction can be granted to restrain such threats pending trial.

13 Dec 2023

The appeal arises from an order dated 21 February 2023 passed by the learned District Judge in Civil Suit No.19 of 2022, whereby the trial court grant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Imported Goods in Trademark Dispute, Directs Customs to Not Withhold Clearance Based on Pending Civil Suit. Customs Authorities Cannot Refuse Clearance Solely Due to Private Trademark Dispute; Remedy Lies in Civil Court Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Jul 2023

The petitioners, UPS Sales and Suzhou Dake Machinery Company Ltd., imported goods under Bill of Lading No. EXSH2310608. The customs authorities (respo...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Design Infringement Suit Transfer Case — Commercial Court at District Level Competent to Decide Cancellation of Design Under Section 22(4) of Designs Act, 2000. Transfer to High Court Not Mandatory Where High Court Lacks Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction.

1 Dec 2020

The present appeal arose from a suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Mold Tek Packaging Ltd., against the appellant, S.D. Containers Indore, seeking a d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Revocation of Patent for Bt Cotton Technology, Remands for Trial on Patent Validity and Infringement Issues. The Court held that patent validity under Section 3(j) of the Patents Act, 1970 cannot be summarily decided without trial and requires expert evidence.

8 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from a suit for permanent injunction filed by Monsanto Technology LLC and others (plaintiffs) again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Return of Plaint in Commercial Dispute Case — Immovable Property Not Used Exclusively in Trade or Commerce. Agreement to Sell and Mortgage Deed Registration Dispute Falls Outside Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Land Was Not Pled to Be Used for Trade or Commerce.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd., filed a Commercial Civil Suit No. 41/2018 before the Commercial Court at Vadodara seeking enforcemen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Two Brothers in IT Act Case — IPC Offences Not Maintainable in Light of Section 67 of IT Act. Non-obstante clause in Section 81 of IT Act overrides IPC for offences involving obscene electronic material, following Sharat Babu Digumarti v. Government (NCT of Delhi).

26 Oct 2018

The petitioners, two brothers, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 86 of 2018 registered at Shahupuri Police Station, Kolhapur,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Notices Against Defendant in Patent Infringement Suit — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court holds that breach of an order must be willful and deliberate to constitute contempt under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, and mere technical or inadvertent violations do not attract punishment.

28 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd., filed a patent infringement suit against Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevention Technologies Pvt. Lt...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Provide Opportunity of Being Heard Before Dispute Resolution Panel. The court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel's failure to grant a hearing under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, vitiated the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The petitioner, M/S Tejas Networks Limited, a company engaged in software development, manufacturing, and trading of networking equipment, filed its r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tax on Hire Purchase Components Under Bombay Sales Tax Act — Option Money, Insurance, and Hire Premium Included in Sale Price. Hire Purchase Transaction Constitutes a Sale and Resale Deduction Under Section 8 Not Available.

30 Jan 2015

The case involves two sales tax references under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, arising from the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal. The applicant, M/s. ...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)