Search Results for "PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "PULP Act"

391 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 391 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

9 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Forest Department in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Regularisation of Daily Wager Upheld. Industrial Court's finding of unfair labour practice under MRTU and PULP Act for non-regularisation of a daily wager with 240 days of continuous service was confirmed by the Single Judge and the Division Bench.

4 Oct 2018

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Chief Conservator of Forests, Pune and another against the judgment and order dated 15th Decemb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Employer in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Industrial Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Reversing Labour Court's Finding on 240 Days Service. Employee Failed to Prove Continuous Service of 240 Days or Applicability of Kalelkar Settlement, Hence Reinstatement Order Set Aside.

27 Oct 2010

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Executive Engineer and Sub-Divisional Engineer (appellants) against the order of the Industrial...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Driver's Dismissal for Rash Driving Causing Deaths. Dismissal Upheld as Not Disproportionate or Unfair Labour Practice Under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Schedule IV, Item 1(g), Despite Acquittal in Criminal Case Under Sections 279 and 304A IPC.

3 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a driver employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) following a departmental enquiry...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Labour Court Award in Favor of Workman in MSRTC Dismissal Case — 25% Back Wages Granted for Procedural Violation. Dismissal Quashed as Enquiry Officer Was Not Appointed by Competent Authority Under Section 6(6) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Aug 2019

The petitioner, the Divisional Controller of Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the judgment and award dated 4.8.2018 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by ICAR and NRCC, Upholds State Government as Appropriate Government for Labour Dispute. Jurisdiction of Labour Court under MRTU & PULP Act Confirmed for Termination of Agricultural Labourers Employed by Central Government Undertaking.

23 Nov 2010

The case involves an appeal by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the National Research Centre for Citrus (NRCC) against a judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeals in Industrial Dispute Cases — Workmen Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages as Retrenchment Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Was Illegal. The court upheld the Labour Court's finding that retrenchment of workmen who had completed 240 days of service was void for non-compliance with Section 25-F, and reinstatement with full back wages was justified.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Godrej Industries Ltd. (formerly Godrej Soaps Ltd.), employed the respondents as workmen. The respondents were retrenched by the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Company's Petition and Dismisses Workmen's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 6 Upheld, but Direction for Permanent Status Set Aside for Workmen Not Proving 240 Days Service Under Item 9.

22 Feb 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order of the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) Nos.169 of 1993 and 493 of 1993. The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order Against Employer for Unfair Labour Practice in Denying Government Resolution Benefits to Non-Teaching Staff. Employer's Failure to Implement Government Resolution Dated 13-5-1999 Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 5 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

5 Oct 2015

The petitioner, J.K. Education Society, an educational institution, challenged the judgment and order of the Industrial Court in Complaint (ULP) No.61...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)