Search Results for "Order 15-A CPC"

38 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 38 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Eviction Case for Unlawful Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Tenants failed to show error apparent on face of record in revision order confirming eviction decree under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioners, who were the defendants in the original eviction suit, filed a review petition before the Bombay High Court seeking review of an orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Unlawful Subletting and Rent Default. Tenant's Claim of Assignment of Tenancy Rights Fails for Lack of Consent of Landlord and Non-Production of Evidence.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Ratnadeep Shankar Narkar (Applicant/Defendant No.2) challenging the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit for Non-Prosecution. Appeal under Section 96 CPC dismissed as appellants failed to appear and no grounds were made out to interfere with the trial court's judgment.

The present First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a judgment and decree passed by the trial court....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications in Rent Control Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Tenancy and Subletting. Landlord's claim for possession under Section 16 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 fails as subletting was not proved and tenant's possession was lawful.

The case involves two civil revision applications arising from a dispute between the landlords (M/s. K. B. Lahoti and Company and others) and the tena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree Under Section 13A(1) of Bombay Rent Act for Bona Fide Requirement of Landlord's Son. Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interferable Under Section 115 CPC as No Jurisdictional Error Found.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging the eviction decree pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Civil Judge's Order in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and limitation was a mixed question of fact and law.

The petitioners, who were defendants in a civil suit filed by the respondents, challenged an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Margao, dated ...