Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules 1989"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Motor Vehicles Rules 1989"

319 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses State Appeals Against Single Judge's Directions on Vehicle Seizure under Motor Vehicles Act. Court Holds that Directions Were Reiteration of Rule 202-B and Custody Cannot Be Given to Parallel Operators Including State Transport Corporations.

1 Apr 2015

The respondent, a tourist bus operator with 265 buses, filed writ petitions seeking a direction that his vehicles not be seized except by following th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

8 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Evaluates Validity of LMV License for Driving JCB; Considers Classification Under Section 2(21) and Endorsement Requirement Under Section 10(2)(j) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Matter Involved an Appeal by the Vehicle Owner Against Tribunal’s Decision Fastening Liability on Him for an Accident Involving a JCB, Where the Driver Held Only a Light Motor Vehicle License.

13 Apr 2023

The appeal arose from a judgment and award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shikaripura in MVC No.211/2007, which fastened liability on t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows BH Series Registration for Petitioner's Motor Car Under Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989. Denial of Registration Without Written Reasons Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

12 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Shri Mahendra Bansilal Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the action of the Commi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of School Bus Colour Rule in Writ Petition Under Article 226. Rule 6(2) of Karnataka Motor Vehicles (Conditions for Vehicles Engaged in Transport of School Children) Rules, 2012, mandating yellow colour for school buses, held intra vires the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and not violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

17 Jun 2013

The petitioner, Sri T.J. Damodara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sub...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers Driving Licence Validity Dispute to Larger Bench for Reconsideration of Mukund Dewangan Precedent. Issue Involves Interpretation of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Provisions on Whether Light Motor Vehicle Licence Covers Transport Vehicle Without Endorsement, Noting Unconsidered Statutory Distinctions.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court was seized of a reference made by a Two-Judge Bench in Civil Appeal No. 841 of 2018 and connected matters, concerning the interpreta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — State Held Liable as Registered Owner Despite Sale of Vehicle in Public Auction. Transfer of ownership under Motor Vehicles Act requires compliance with Section 50; auction sale does not absolve registered owner of liability until formal transfer is completed.

21 Jul 2017

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Director of Health Services, appealed against the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Transfer of Vehicle Ownership in Public Auction Not Distinguishable from Sale Simpliciter. State Government Held Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for Accident Caused by Jeep Sold in Auction but Not Transferred in RTO Records.

21 Jul 2017

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Director of Health Services, filed an appeal challenging the judgment and order of the Motor Accident Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A MV Act — Insurer Liable Despite Alleged Licence Violation. Claim under Section 163-A is no-fault liability; insurer cannot avoid payment on ground of driver lacking licence.

29 Jan 2014

The case arises from a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by the legal representatives of Babasaheb Wankhede, wh...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Regulatory Framework for Aggregator Licensing Under Motor Vehicles Act - Guidelines Not Mandatory for State Governments. The Court held that Central Government's Motor Vehicle Aggregator Guidelines 2020 have persuasive value but are not binding on State Governments when granting licenses under Section 93 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, as the proviso uses permissive language 'may follow' and ultimate discretion rests with States.

7 Feb 2023

The Supreme Court addressed petitions challenging the validity of a notification issued by the State of Maharashtra and related judgments of the Bomba...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)