Search Results for "Marks Totaling"

41 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 41 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery and Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence and test identification parade found insufficient to convict accused No.2 under Sections 392, 302, 468, 201 read with 34 IPC.

This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the second accused by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Sessions Case No.724...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Income Proof. Multiplier Applied as per Sarla Verma and Future Prospects Denied for Agriculturist Without Stable Income.

The appeal was filed by the Insurance Company challenging the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmednagar, in MACP No.638 of 2009, which a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation of Rs. 13 Lakhs Upheld for Death of Lecturer with Multiple Income Sources. Tribunal's Assessment of Income, Future Prospects, and Multiplier Found Correct Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the respondents, who are the widow, minor daughter, and parents of the deceased Sheshrao...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Recovery Proceedings and Civil Imprisonment Order for Non-Payment of Dues. Recovery Officer's Order for Arrest and Detention of Defaulter Under Section 28A of SEBI Act, 1992 Upheld as Valid Exercise of Powers.

The petitioner, Vinod Hinigorani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the validity of orders dated 18.12....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition for Want of Evidence. Claimant's Unrebutted Testimony and Medical Records Sufficient to Prove Accident and Injuries Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sunith Kumar V., filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Toll Road Tender and Concession Period. Policy decisions regarding toll collection and concession periods are not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

The petitioner, Nandu Sambaji Nagarkar, a social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging th...