Search Results for "Maharashtra Forest Rules"

420 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forest Notification and Collector's Order Under Maharashtra Private Forest Act. Land Declared as Forest in 1960 Notification Cannot Be Challenged After Decades; Collector's Suo Motu Order Under Section 22(5) Upheld.

The petitioners, claiming to be owners of land in Survey No.245/4B, Kavesar, Thane, challenged an order dated 27 March 2015 passed suo motu by the Dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Forest Officers Against Injunction in Forest Rights Suit. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Entertain Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Forest Rights Under Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006.

The present Civil Revision Application was filed by the original defendant nos. 2 and 3 (applicants herein) against the order of the trial court grant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Forest Land Dispute — Non-Compliance of Section 114(A) Notice Not Fatal at Threshold Stage. Notice under Section 114(A) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 is procedural and not a bar to maintainability of suit for declaration and injunction.

The appellants, Sidramayya and Roopa, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order to Reinstate IFS Officer in Disciplinary Proceedings. Court holds that charges of misconduct were not established and that the disciplinary authority's order was based on no evidence.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the State of Maharashtra and others challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MRT) ...