Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

524 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 524 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Employer for Unfair Labour Practice Under Section 48(1) of MRTU and PULP Act for Non-Compliance of Reinstatement Order. The court held that mens rea is not essential for an offence under Section 48(1) and that the applicant, being in charge of the trust, was liable for non-compliance of the Labour Court's reinstatement order.

1 Oct 2020

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Father Jerome Gonsalves, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 48(...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in SARFAESI Act Priority Dispute — Employees' Dues Cannot Override Bank's Claim Over Sale Proceeds of Co-operative Society's Assets. The Court held that Section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 does not apply to co-operative societies due to Section 167 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960, and employees' dues recoverable as arrears of land revenue do not create a paramount charge over secured assets.

4 Dec 2019

The appeal arose from a dispute between the Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. (appellant) and employees of Vainganga Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Fixed-Term Security Guard in Saudi Arabian Airlines Case. Fixed-term employment found to be a camouflage to deny permanency benefits under MRTU & PULP Act.

1 Nov 2018

The appellant, Saudi Arabian Airlines, engaged the respondent workman as a Security Guard on a fixed-term contract from 1st October 1989 for two years...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Lockout Legality Under MRTU & PULP Act. Industrial Court's finding that lockout was legal under Item 6 Schedule II of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 upheld; justifiability not required to be examined separately.

17 Jul 2018

The Engineering Workers Association (petitioner) challenged an order of the Industrial Court at Thane which held that a lockout declared by Radium Cre...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

15 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

28 Nov 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Jurisdiction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Cement Industry Declared Controlled Industry Under Section 2(ee) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Delegation of Powers Under Section 39 Does Not Alter Appropriate Government Status.

15 Feb 2010

The petitioner, UltraTech Cement Ltd., successor to M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited, challenged an order dated 04.01.2010 of the Labour Court, Chandrapur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Unfair Labour Practice Orders — Industrial Court's Findings Upheld Under MRTU & PULP Act. Employer Denied Salary and Benefits to Employees During Strike Period, Constituting Unfair Labour Practices Under Items 5 and 9 of Schedule IV.

31 Aug 2006

The petitioners, National Textile Corporation (Maharashtra North) Limited and its General Manager, challenged two orders of the Industrial Court at Bo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workers' Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case Against Textile Mill. Held that the Industrial Court's finding of no unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act was based on evidence and not perverse.

5 Apr 2006

The petitioners, workers employed by respondent no. 1 (Shri Ram Mills), filed a complaint before the Industrial Court under the Maharashtra Recognitio...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)