Search Results for "MRT"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "MRT"

73 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 73 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition and Dismisses Tenants' Petition in Agricultural Tenancy Dispute. Landlord's bonafide need for personal cultivation under Section 33B and default in rent under Section 25 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 upheld.

7 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from agricultural tenancy disputes over the same suit property. The landlord, Tukaram Maruti Dubal, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Purchasers Challenging Eviction Order in Tenancy Dispute — Purchasers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Order Passed Against Tenant Before Their Purchase. The court held that the petitioners, who purchased the suit land after the eviction order under Section 14 read with Section 25(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, cannot challenge that order as they were not parties to the proceedings.

19 Jan 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by three petitioners, who are purchasers of agricultural...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

10 Jan 2012

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Revision — Suo Moto Revision Barred by Limitation and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 76A of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. The Additional Collector lacked jurisdiction to revise an order of the Sub Divisional Officer beyond one year and under a provision applicable only to Mamlatdar or Tribunal orders.

6 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Rajaram S. Patil, challenged an order dated 22 November 2013 of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) which had set aside an order da...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Land Transfer Without Previous Sanction Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act. Post-transfer sanction cannot regularize invalid transfer; MRT order set aside.

5 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Saraswati Shamrao Dhere, was a tenant of half portion of agricultural land in Shiroli, Kolhapur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were ten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Purchase Declared Ineffective Due to Tenant's Default in Payment of Instalments. MRT's Condonation of Delay Without Proper Opportunity to Oppose Set Aside.

30 Nov 2012

The case involves agricultural lands owned by the petitioners (landlords) which were let out to the deceased respondent no.1 (tenant). The tenant was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Tribunal Orders in Tenancy Dispute. Court upholds concurrent findings that petitioners failed to prove personal cultivation and that tenants were entitled to purchase land under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

7 Dec 2010

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Madhav Dashrath Vahadane and Nivrutti Dashrath Vahadane (petitioners) challenging orders passed u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Applications in Ceiling Act Case — Purchasers from Surplus Land Owner Not Entitled to Review as No Error Apparent on Record. The court held that purchasers cannot claim better rights than their vendor and that review is not an appeal in disguise.

1 Feb 2018

The judgment concerns two review applications (Miscellaneous Civil Application No.81/1999 and No.86/1999) filed by purchasers of agricultural land fro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

21 Aug 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Petitioner's Long Possession as Tenant Does Not Bar Restoration.

2 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Hirakant Ramchandra Kothari, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: one dated 23...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)