Search Results for "MMC Act 1888"

164 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 164 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal Quashing Municipal Notice Under MMC Act Due to Jurisdictional Defect -- Notice Under Section 314 Invalid for Failing to Specify Contravention of Sections 312, 313 or 313A

The appellant challenged a City Civil Court order that validated a notice under Section 314 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (MMC Act) re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order to Deposit Water Charges Arrears Under Order XV-A CPC in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Consent Terms and Lease Deed Interpretation Confirm Tenant's Liability for Water Charges Despite Claim of Lessor's Responsibility.

The petitioners, Nikhilesh Keshrichand Jhaveri and others, challenged the judgment and order dated 12 July 2021 passed by the Appellate Bench of Small...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows FCI Appeal in Property Tax Exemption Case — Holds That Occupier of Central Government Property Is Not Liable Under Article 285(1) When Ownership Vests in Union. Bombay High Court Erred in Relying on Section 146 of MMC Act Without Considering Ownership Status.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Food Corporation of India (FCI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 05.05.2016 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 957 OF 2013

The petitioners, retired employees of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, along with other slum dwellers, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Holding Suit Maintainable Despite MRTP Act Bar. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted Under Section 149 of MRTP Act Where Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Just Planning Violations.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an order dated 22/3/2013 passed by ...