Search Results for "MACT"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Bus Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Owner Held Liable for Compensation Due to Invalid Permit and Route Violation. Concurrent findings of fact that vehicle was plied without valid permit and on unauthorized route upheld; no interference warranted.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, a 24-year-old Managing Director of a company, died in a collision with a bus owned by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Dependents in Motor Accident Compensation Case — High Court's Factually Erroneous Findings Set Aside. Income Tax Return Filed Before Death Must Be Considered; Future Prospects and Conventional Heads Awarded as Per Pranay Sethi.

The present civil appeal was filed by the dependents of Harish Singh Arya, who died at age 35 in a motor vehicle accident on 18.06.2007. The deceased ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside MACT Order Deleting Insurance Company in Motor Accident Claim -- Premature Deletion Without Evidence Violates Natural Justice -- Reinstatement of Party for Proper Adjudication Under Motor Vehicles Act

The High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed a writ petition challenging an order of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) that deleted Bajaj Allianz ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Appeal in Fatal Bus Accident Case — Compensation Award of Rs.2,52,000/- Upheld. Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur Applied to Establish Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.

The appellant, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara, dated 31st De...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Sets Aside MACT Dismissal for Failure to Prove Negligence. Claimant's evidence of rash driving by respondent motorcyclist found sufficient to establish negligence under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Mr. Sameer S. Desai, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Medical Expenses. Claimant's Appeal for Enhancement Dismissed as Tribunal's Assessment of Income and Medical Expenses Was Based on Conjectures.

The case involves a motor accident claim arising from an incident on 14.12.2005 when the claimant, Ravikumar, a pedestrian, was hit by a car bearing r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A, Corrects Multiplier Error. No Fault Liability Provision Does Not Require Proof of Negligence; Multiplier Must Be Based on Victim's Age.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the mother of a 28-year-old deceased who was a pillion rider. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal ...