Search Results for "Lok Adalat jurisdiction"

60 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 60 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Award in Execution Proceedings. Lok Adalat Award Under Section 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Is Final and Binding and Cannot Be Challenged Under Section 47 CPC.

The petitioner, Dhanraj Dnyaneshwar Koche, along with respondent No.2, owned an agricultural field and entered into an agreement to sell it to respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Lok Adalat Award Due to Procedural Irregularities. Senior Citizen's Rights Upheld Amid Allegations of Coercion and Fraud in Disputed Property Settlement.

The Bombay High Court, presided by Justice Gauri Godse, quashed the award passed by the Lok Adalat in a property dispute involving Madhukar Baburao Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Compromise Decree in Lok Adalat Due to Fraud and Non-Compliance with Legal Requirements. Petitioner, who was a minor at the time of compromise, was not represented by a guardian, rendering the decree void ab initio under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC.

The petitioner, Smt. Pooja, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a compromise decree dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquiring Body Barred from Seeking Reference under Section 28-A(3) of the Land Acquisition Act. The Bombay High Court ruled that acquiring bodies cannot seek references under Section 28-A(3), as the legislative intent was to benefit landowners, not the acquiring bodies.

  Background of Acquisition (Paras 1-2) Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited was the acquiring body for the Bori Medium...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revocation of Earthquake Affected Person Certificate: Petition Dismissed. Court finds adoption invalid due to non-compliance with Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, impacting petitioner’s police constable selection.

The petitioner, sought to quash the circular and order that revoked his Earthquake Affected Person Certificate, which was crucial for his selection as...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Electricity Theft Case to High Court for Fresh Consideration Under Section 152 of Electricity Act, 2003. Settlement in Lok Adalat does not automatically quash FIR; compounding provisions must be examined.

The appellant, Mukesh Chand, was a consumer of electricity who obtained a connection from BSES Rajdhani Power Limited for his business premises. BSES ...