Search Results for "Lok Adalat Award"

107 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 107 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Proceedings for Specific Performance — Decree Holder Entitled to Enforce Compromise Award Despite Judgment Debtor's SC Status. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree to Question Its Validity Under Karnataka SC/ST (PTCL) Act, 1978.

The petitioner, Shri Rahees Ahmed, was the decree holder in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 10.01.2011 in respect of lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Expeditious Disposal of Execution Case and Restoration of Conviction — Execution Case Already Disposed, Conviction Set Aside on Appeal. No Mandamus Issued as Relief Sought Became Infructuous.

The petitioner, Mr. Hemachandra M. Kuppalli, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise in Domestic Violence Case — No Fraud Established Against Settlement Reached Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The petitioner, Satish Baburao Yadav, challenged an order dated 08.12.2018 passed by the Panel of Lok Adalat in P.W.D.V.A. (Cri.M.A.) No. 62/2018, whi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition in Execution Dispute — Quashes Order Dismissing Execution Petition as Not Maintainable. Withdrawal of Earlier Execution Petition Without Liberty Does Not Bar Fresh Execution Under Order XXI Rule 2 CPC.

The writ petition was filed by the judgment-debtors (petitioners) challenging an order dated 19.04.2017 passed by the LII Additional City Civil and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Partition Suit for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners, who were entitled to 1/4th share each in joint family property, were not allotted any share in compromise decree passed without their consent.

The petitioners, Vajravathi and Roopa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the award dated 13.04...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Refund of Court Fees in Motor Accident Claims Settled Through Lok Adalat or Mediation Under Section 89 CPC. Fees paid under Rule 278(i) of Motor Vehicles Rules, 1991 are refundable under Section 16 of Court Fees Act, 1870 read with Section 21 of Legal Services Act, 1987.

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of a submission by the Registrar (Judicial) & Member Secretary of the Goa State Legal Services A...