Search Results for "Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes PIL on Footpath Encroachments with Directions for Removal and Monitoring. Court holds that encroachments on public footpaths violate pedestrian rights and must be cleared by municipal authorities, with compliance monitored by District Legal Services Authority.

The petitioner, D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163A MV Act — No Defence of Contributory Negligence Available in Structured Formula Claims. Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Despite Alleged Negligence of Deceased as Section 163A is a No-Fault Liability Scheme.

The appeal arises out of a judgment and award dated 20.06.2013 in M.V.C.No.301/2011 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge & M.A.C.T., Puttur, D.K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.4,10,000 for Death of Lorry Owner. Negligence of Driver Proved; Insurer Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of Manju Naik, who died in a road accident on 19-04-2010. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case. Multiplier applied as per Sarla Verma, future prospects granted at 40% for self-employed deceased, compensation recalculated.

The case arises from a motor accident claim for compensation. The deceased, a 25-year-old bachelor, died in a road accident involving a vehicle insure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Transport Operators Challenging Checkpost Fees Under Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Tax Act. Levy of Checkpost Fees Held Compensatory and Not Discriminatory Under Article 14.

The petitioners, seventeen transport operators having their principal place of business in Bangalore, Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 2...