Search Results for "Joint venture"

Trending :

Search Results for "Joint venture"

565 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 565 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Partition Dispute, Reversing High Court's Decision on Self-Acquired Property Status. The Court held that the High Court exceeded jurisdiction under Section 100 CPC by deciding a factual issue, and the property was self-acquired as purchased after partition using own funds, not joint family funds.

22 Apr 2025

The dispute involved a property partition suit among family members. The appellant, as Defendant No.2, purchased the suit property from Defendant No.1...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Ruling on Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited: A Complex Case Involving Coal Block Allocation and Legal Interpretations. A detailed examination of the legal challenges surrounding the joint venture agreements, audit reports, and allegations of criminal conspiracy in the coal mining sector.

23 Aug 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed the appeals filed by M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited and its Managing Director, challenging the charges fr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Orders Against Two Firms in WCL Tender Dispute — Lack of Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that blacklisting a contractor without prior notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 14 of the Constitution.

30 Nov 2023

The petitioners, M/s H.D. Enterprises (HDE) and M/s Gaurav Contracts Company (GCC), had entered into a joint venture/consortium agreement on 23.05.201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Joint Venture Challenging Disqualification in Metro Rail Tender — Holds That Experience Criteria Must Be Interpreted Reasonably and Cumulatively for Joint Ventures. The court quashed the disqualification of M/s GYTTPL Joint Venture by Nagpur Metro Rail Corporation Limited for not meeting clause 4.2(a) experience criteria individually, directing consideration of combined experience.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, M/s GYTTPL Joint Venture, a joint venture between a Chinese state-owned enterprise and TATA Projects Limited, submitted a tender for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Winding Up Orders in Company Law Dispute — Failure to Discharge Debt and Lack of Bona Fide Dispute Justify Winding Up Under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the appellants had no genuine dispute regarding the debt and the winding up petitions were maintainable.

9 Mar 2016

The judgment pertains to three appeals filed by Neelkanth Devansh Developers Private Limited, Neelkanth Soham Developers Private Limited, and Neelkant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

26 Nov 2015

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

20 Jan 2015

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Tender Award in Octroi Computerization Contract. Court upholds tender committee's evaluation of bidder's experience under Clause 18.5 of tender document, finding no arbitrariness.

3 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Vidarbh Infotech Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Pun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit by Unregistered Partnership Firm Under Section 69 of Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Barred as Firm Not Registered, No Exception for Suits Relating to Partnership Property Applies.

6 Nov 2012

The plaintiffs, seven individuals, filed a suit seeking a declaration that they are partners of the firm Laxmi Developers and for an injunction restra...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal and High Court Decision That Income-Tax Officer Cannot Assess Same Income Both Individually and as Unregistered Firm. Assessment of Unregistered Firm Invalid After Option Exercised to Assess Partners Under Income-tax Act, 1922, Section 23(3).

7 Jan 1966

The dispute arose out of assessment proceedings for the assessment year 1954-55 involving three individuals, M, P and G, who carried on business in se...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)