Search Results for "Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946"

184 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 184 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Under Article 227, Sets Aside Industrial Court's Finding That Fire Brigade Department Is Not Industrial Establishment -- Matter Remanded For Fresh Consideration

The petitioner, Mumbai Fire Services Union, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging the Industrial Court's findin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Contractual Employees Against Municipal Corporation for Regularization and Equal Pay. Court Holds That Long-Term Contractual Workers Are Entitled to Consideration for Regularization Under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractual employees of Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation seeking regularization of their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Probationary Employees in Air India Ltd. — Probationers Have No Right to Be Confirmed and Termination Without Stigma Is Valid.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Jeetendra Krishna Varma (WP 875/2011) and Mayank Mohan Sharma (WP 1427/2015) against Air India Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds 60 Years Retirement Age for Workmen Under Model Standing Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Reduction of Retirement Age from 60 to 58 Years Held Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal and Cross Objection against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Employee Abandoned Service by Taking Up Employment Abroad Without Intimation. Clause 13.4 of Certified Standing Orders Validly Invoked to Terminate Employment for Abandonment of Service Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Infomedia India Ltd., engaged the First Respondent as a machine operator at its printing establishment in Mumbai. On 22 June 1992, the...