Search Results for "Indian Telegraph Act, 1885"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Intra-Court Appeal in High Tension Tower Erection Dispute on Patta Land. Court Directs Landowner to Seek Compensation Under Section 16(3) of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, Upholding Public Interest in Essential Services over Private Land Objections.

The dispute arose from the proposed erection of a high tension tower on patta land belonging to the appellant, Jaya Santhi, in Sethupattu Village, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Public Interest Over Private Land Use. Court Upholds Public Infrastructure Development over Landowners’ Rights, Ensuring Fair Compensation for Damages.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition filed by landowners challenging the Goa Tamnar Transmission Project. The court ruled that the project, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Rental Compensation for Transmission Towers Erected in 1981 Without Consent or Compensation. Landowners entitled to compensation under Section 10(d) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 164 of the Electricity Act, 2003 for continued use of land.

The petitioners, eight landowners from Ashiv and Wangi villages in Latur district, filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 04.07.2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Without Timely Challenge Estops Employee from Alleging Coercion Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Voluntary Retirement Scheme Acceptance and Payment of Dues Barred Complaint. Acceptance of VRS Benefits Creates Estoppel Against Challenging the Scheme Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Mrs. Ashalata Shridhar Tawate, joined Overseas Communications Services (OCS) in September 1975, which was later taken over by Videsh S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging SEBI's Power to Call Call Data Records. SEBI's Investigative Powers Under Section 11 of SEBI Act, 1992 Include Access to CDRs, and Such Access Does Not Violate Right to Privacy.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Indian Council of Investors challenging the Securities and Exchange Bo...