Search Results for "Indian Companies Act 1913"

180 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 180 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking MEIS Benefits Despite Inadvertent Error in Shipping Bills. Court Directs Acceptance of Amended Shipping Bills and Grant of MEIS Scrips, Holding That Systemic Limitations Cannot Deny Legitimate Claims Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to accept amendments made in three shipping bills...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Admission of Winding Up Petition in Shareholder Deadlock Case. The core issue concerns whether a petitioner who is not the registered shareholder can maintain a winding up petition after the registered shareholder merged into it.

The dispute concerned the winding up of Capital Controls India Private Limited, a joint venture between Chloro Controls (India) Private Limited and Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Law on Dividend in Liquidation Under Section 2(6A)(c) of Income-tax Act, 1922. Distribution on Liquidation Attributed to Accumulated Profits to be Determined on the Basis of Accumulated Profits Immediately Before Liquidation.

The respondent company was placed under voluntary winding up by resolution dated August 23, 1952. Its paid-up capital was Rs. 25 lakhs and accumulated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Company Application Seeking Recall of Winding Up Petition Admission Order Against Kingfisher Airlines Limited. Company Court Has No Power to Recall or Review Its Own Order Admitting a Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956.

The applicant, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, filed an application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking recall of the order dated 30.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Continues Ex-Parte Injunction in Copyright and Trademark Infringement Suit Over ATYATI Device Mark. The Court found no suppression by the Plaintiff and held that the Defendants' adoption of a deceptively similar logo without explanation warranted continuation of the injunction.

The present suit was filed by the Plaintiff, a company engaged in IT solutions, alleging infringement of its copyright in the ATYATI device mark, infr...