Search Results for "Income-tax Act 1922"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Income-tax Act 1922"

27 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Dividend Stripping Provision Under Section 94(7) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Applicable Where Assessee Suffered Net Loss on Sale of Mutual Fund Units Exceeding Dividend Received.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Karan Maheshwari, an individual investor in shares, stocks, securities, and mutual funds, challenged a show cause notice dated 20 Augu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Remand Order in Income Tax Appeal — Scope of Appellate Powers Under Section 254 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has the power to remand a matter for fresh assessment when the Assessing Officer has not properly considered the assessee's method of accounting and the quantum of on-money.

15 Nov 2016

The case involves an income tax reference and a connected writ petition filed by Parmanand Builders Pvt. Ltd. (the assessee) against the Commissioner ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Keyman Insurance Premium Deduction Case. Partnership Firm's Premium on Partner's Life Insurance Held Allowable as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

31 Mar 2010

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case; Arrear Dividends on Shares Held Not Taxable as Income. Purchase of Shares Cum-Dividend Implied Price Included Dividend Amount, Which Was Not Income of the Purchaser but Capital Receipt Under Income-tax Act, 1922.

7 Aug 1969

The case involved a tax dispute regarding the treatment of arrear dividends received by the respondent, India Discount Co. Ltd., a dealer in shares an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Income-Tax Officer's Appeal, Affirming That Notice Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 Could Not Be Issued as Right to Reopen Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922 Was Barred. Section 297(2)(d)(ii) of 1961 Act Does Not Revive Time-Barred Reassessment Powers.

20 Aug 1968

The case involved an income-tax reassessment dispute arising under the Income-tax Act, 1922 and the Income-tax Act, 1961. The respondent, an assessee,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Income Tax Case Regarding Refund of Excess Profits Tax. Repayment of excess profits tax received by a company in England deemed income under Section 11(14) of Indian Finance Act, 1946, irrespective of territorial source.

16 Mar 1959

The appellant, McGregor & Balfour Ltd., a company incorporated in the United Kingdom with its head office there, also carried on business in India. In...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)