Search Results for "Identity Theft"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings in IT Act and IPC Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Cheating or Identity Theft. Consensual Relationship Not Amounting to Cheating Under Section 420 IPC or Identity Theft Under Section 66(C) of Information Technology Act, 2000.

The petitioner, Sanjana Fernandes @ Raveera, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Drug-Laced Banana and Theft Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 328 and 379 IPC set aside as sole witness failed to identify accused in court and prosecution failed to prove administration of intoxicating substance.

The appellant, Rajesh Jatihusain Ansari, was convicted by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for offences under Sections 328 (administering...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Theft Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. The court held that the chain of circumstances, including last seen together and recovery of stolen property, was sufficient to sustain conviction under Sections 302 and 379 IPC.

The appellant, Dilip Karbhari Govind, was convicted by the learned Ad-Hoc Additional Judge-2, Niphad, in Sessions Case No.42 of 2005 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Dacoity with Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Stolen Articles. Conviction Under Sections 396, 457, and 380 IPC Confirmed as Recovery of Stolen Ornaments Soon After Incident Establishes Guilt.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Noora, Gorakh, and Navnath against their conviction and sentence by the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case arises from three criminal appeals filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Omerga, in Sessions Case No. 19/201...